Guidelines
Suggest edit

Add annotations and place labels to orient readers on a map

For explanatory reading of a map from a specific point of view, use annotations and place labels on the map to improve insight and mitigate disorientation for readers locating the reference place and likely destinations.

  • purpose:refine
  • basis:heuristic
  • chart:map
  • data:geospatial
  • quality:insight
  • lever:text-annotation
  • component:annotation:use
  • polish:annotation

advice

On-map orientation text

Add on-map text that identifies the reference place and a small set of relevant destinations. For example, place an annotation at the starting location and label a few cities with their values so readers can see where the map’s perspective begins and where the likely answers are.

reason

Why orientation text works on maps

Annotations and selected place labels turn a general map pattern into a situated answer. They show readers where to look and which locations matter to the question the map is answering.

Mechanism: The annotation anchors the reader to the map’s point of view, and the place labels point out specific candidate locations that answer the question.

Evidence: The post recommends adding an annotation to orient readers to the author’s perspective and adding city labels to point them toward potential solutions to the question posed by the map (Mintzer-Sweeney, 2024).

context

Use when the map is read from a specific perspective

  • User Goal: Help readers understand the map from one reference location and spot possible answers.
  • Task: Explanation and orientation on a static map view.
  • Chart Setting: The map currently shows geographic coloring but gives little on-map guidance about the viewpoint or candidate places.
  • Success Criterion: A reader can identify the reference place and several relevant destinations directly from the map.

exceptions

Do not use when the map does not depend on a specific viewpoint or candidate places

Break it when: The map is not framed from one perspective and does not need to highlight a few possible places. Why: The source presents annotations and city labels as bonus text specifically for orientation and solution-finding.

costs

Tradeoffs of adding map text

Sacrifice: You give up some empty space on the map.
Risk: Too many labels can crowd the geography.
Mitigation: Label only the reference place and a few locations that directly support the map’s answer.

mistakes

Common orientation failure

Mistake: Leave the map as colored geography only when the story depends on one viewpoint and a few possible destinations. Why it fails: Readers can see the pattern but not how to apply it to the intended question.

check

Check whether the map is oriented enough

Failure Sign: A reviewer can see hot and cool regions but cannot identify the starting point or any example destinations from the map itself.
Quick Check: Glance at the static map and ask whether one reference place and several relevant places are visibly named.
Stronger Test: A reviewer should be able to describe the perspective and name at least one plausible destination from the annotated map alone.

fix

Fix the map text

  • Add one short annotation at the reference location.
  • Add labels for a small set of places that help answer the map’s question.
  • Keep the labels focused on likely solutions rather than labeling everything.

References

Mintzer-Sweeney, R. (2024). Fix my chart \textraquo Using text elements. https://www.datawrapper.de/blog/fix-my-chart-text-elements