Guidelines
Suggest edit

Remove 3-D depth cues when the chart must support an immediate decision

For immediate decision support, avoid added 3-D depth cues on line or bar charts of 2-D quantitative data to improve readability and mitigate memory-oriented embellishment for decision-makers using the figure right now.

  • purpose:refine
  • basis:empirical
  • audience:decision-maker
  • reading-mode:exact
  • lever:encoding
  • quality:readability
  • aesthetic:style:avoid

advice

Flatten the rendering for immediate use

Remove gratuitous 3-D depth cues when a chart must help people decide now. For example, use a 2-D area line or 2-D area bar instead of a 3-D volume version when the figure is meant for immediate use rather than later recall.

reason

Why flat rendering fits immediate use

Extra depth cues add visual flourish that can make a chart stand out, but that same flourish does not match a task centered on immediate use.

Mechanism: A flat rendering keeps attention on the values instead of on redundant depth cues, which better fits charts meant to support a decision right away.

Evidence: In the paper’s preference studies, 2-D graphs were chosen more often than 3-D graphs when the chart was for immediate use, while 3-D graphs were preferred more when memorability was emphasized (Levy et al., 1996).

context

Use when the decision happens now

  • User Goal: Support a decision that must be made immediately.
  • Task: Help viewers use the chart right now rather than remember it later.
  • Data: 2-D quantitative data already planned as a line or bar graph.
  • Chart Setting: A static graph where 3-D depth cues are optional.
  • Audience: Decision-makers using the figure in the moment.
  • Success Criterion: Viewers judge the chart as better for immediate use than a 3-D alternative.

exceptions

Do not use when later recall is the main goal

Break it when: The chart is being designed mainly so viewers will remember it later without referring back. Why: Under memory-focused conditions, 3-D graphs were preferred.

costs

Costs of removing depth cues

Sacrifice: Some visual punch and memorability. Risk: The chart may feel less striking in a presentation setting. Mitigation: Reintroduce depth only when delayed recall, not immediate use, is the main requirement.

mistakes

Common misuse of flat rendering

Mistake: Keeping 3-D shading because it looks more impressive even though the figure is for a same-day decision. Why it fails: The preference pattern linked 3-D styling to memorability, not to immediate use.

check

Check whether depth is hurting the immediate-use goal

Failure Sign: Reviewers say the 3-D version looks memorable or showy, but not better for deciding now. Quick Check: Compare flat and 3-D versions of the same chart and ask which one is better for making the decision right away. Stronger Test: Ask intended viewers to choose the version they would keep on screen while making the decision now.

fix

Fix the rendering choice

  • Remove depth shading from the current line or bar chart.
  • Redraw a 3-D volume line or bar as its 2-D area version.
  • Keep the flat version for the decision-facing display when the same data could also be shown in a more memorable form later.

References

Levy, E., Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. (1996). Gratuitous graphics? Putting preferences in perspective. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Common Ground - CHI ’96, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238400