Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use a single 24-hour bar chart to find the daily maximum

For finding the maximum in cyclic-time hourly data, use a single-view structure on bar charts to improve fidelity and mitigate wrong-half selections for non-expert readers.

  • purpose:select
  • basis:empirical
  • task:extreme
  • time:cyclic-time
  • chart:bar
  • structure:single-view:use
  • structure:multi-view:avoid
  • quality:fidelity
  • lever:layout-structure

advice

Use one continuous 24-hour bar view

Use one continuous 24-hour bar chart when the task is to find the day-wide maximum. For example, merge separate AM and PM bar panels into one 24-hour axis instead of asking readers to scan two 12-hour charts for the highest bar.

reason

Why one continuous view works

A continuous bar view lets readers scan one run of bars and judge the global maximum without switching panels. Split views force a cross-panel search and can make readers pick the highest bar from the wrong half of the day.

Mechanism: One uninterrupted sequence reduces panel switching and supports a direct search for the tallest bar across the full day.

Evidence: For the daily-pattern maximum task, the 24-hour linear bar chart was the fastest condition, and split charts produced errors where readers selected the maximum from the wrong chart half (Waldner et al., 2020; Zeng & Battle, 2023).

context

Use when the maximum must be found across the whole day

  • User Goal: Identify the highest hour in the full 24-hour cycle.
  • Task: Find the global maximum.
  • Data: One value per hour across a single day.
  • Chart Setting: Bar chart shown either as one 24-hour view or as separate AM/PM panels.
  • Audience: Non-expert readers.
  • Success Criterion: Fast and correct selection of the day-wide maximum.

exceptions

When to break the rule

Break it when: The available width cannot support a readable 24-hour bar chart. Why: The supported fallback is to keep the display linear and split it into separate bar panels rather than switching to a rose chart.

costs

What you trade away

Sacrifice: You lose the smaller AM/PM chunks that can make each half feel locally simpler. Risk: If the 24-hour chart is squeezed too tightly, bars can become crowded. Mitigation: Use split linear panels only as a fallback when the continuous 24-hour view does not fit.

mistakes

Common failure mode

Mistake: Keeping separate AM and PM panels when the reader must find the day-wide maximum. Why it fails: Readers can stop at the maximum in one panel and miss that the higher bar is in the other panel.

check

How to test the choice

Failure Sign: Readers report the maximum from AM or PM without checking the other half. Quick Check: A/B test a 24-hour bar chart against split AM/PM bar charts on one maximum-finding question. Stronger Test: Record completion time and note whether wrong answers come from choosing the tallest bar in the wrong panel.

fix

What to change

  • Merge AM and PM panels into one 24-hour bar chart for the maximum-finding view.
  • Keep one continuous hourly axis so the tallest bar is searched in a single scan.
  • If the chart cannot fit at full width, use split linear bar panels as the fallback rather than a radial chart.

References

Waldner, M., Diehl, A., Gračanin, D., Splechtna, R., Delrieux, C., & Matković, K. (2020). A Comparison of Radial and Linear Charts for Visualizing Daily Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1), 1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934784
Zeng, Z., & Battle, L. (2023). A Review and Collation of Graphical Perception Knowledge for Visualization Recommendation. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581349