Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use bar charts to emphasize discrete value comparison

For discrete comparison between separate quantitative observations, prefer a bar chart on simple comparison displays to improve readability and mitigate unintended trend interpretations for readers.

  • purpose:select
  • basis:empirical
  • task:compare
  • chart:bar:use
  • chart:line:avoid
  • quality:readability:use
  • lever:chart-family

advice

Bar chart selection

Choose a bar chart when the main job is to compare separate values as distinct observations. For example, use bars instead of a connected line when you want readers to compare amounts directly rather than infer a continuous trend.

reason

Why bars emphasize comparison

Bars steer readers toward discrete judgments. Even when the underlying values are identical to a line chart, the bar form frames them as separate quantities to compare.

Mechanism: The separated bar marks cue item-by-item comparison, while a connecting line suggests continuity and trend.

Evidence: The paper summarizes evidence that the same values receive different verbal interpretations depending on whether they are shown as bars or lines: bars prompt discrete comparisons, while lines prompt trend descriptions (Bertini et al., 2020).

context

Use when comparison is the intended interpretation

  • User Goal: Compare separate quantities directly.
  • Task: Discrete comparison rather than trend reading.
  • Data: Separate observations that should not be read as one continuous trajectory.
  • Chart Setting: You are choosing between a bar chart and a line chart for the same values.
  • Audience: Readers who need the chart to cue direct comparison.
  • Success Criterion: Readers describe which values are larger or smaller rather than talking about trend shape.

exceptions

Do not use when continuity is the message

Break it when: The main job is to show a continuous trend across an ordered sequence. Why: Bars encourage separate comparisons and weaken the continuity cue.

costs

Costs of using bars for comparison

Sacrifice: You give up the strong visual cue for continuous trend and shape. Risk: Blind use can hide the intended rise, fall, or trajectory of the series. Mitigation: Switch to a line when the audience should read the sequence as one continuous pattern.

mistakes

Common bar-chart misuse

Mistake: Using bars when the chart should communicate a continuous trend. Why it fails: The bar form invites discrete comparison instead of a trend interpretation.

check

Check whether bars are the right choice

Failure Sign: Reviewers describe the chart as a trend when you need direct comparison, or they struggle to compare separate amounts quickly. Quick Check: Render the same values as both bars and a line, then ask a reviewer what the chart is mainly showing. Stronger Test: Keep the version that makes reviewers compare separate amounts without prompting.

fix

Fix the chart choice

  • Replace the connected line with bars for the separate observations.
  • Keep the bars visually separate so each value reads as an independent quantity.
  • Switch back to a line if reviewers keep reading the display as a trend instead of a comparison.

References

Bertini, E., Correll, M., & Franconeri, S. (2020). Why Shouldn’t All Charts Be Scatter Plots? Beyond Precision-Driven Visualizations. 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00048