Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use a line graph to show general trends

For overview trend reading, prefer a line chart on quantitative point sequences to improve insight and mitigate point-by-point detail emphasis for viewers who need the gist.

  • purpose:select
  • basis:empirical
  • task:trend
  • chart:line:use
  • chart:bar:avoid
  • reading-mode:overview
  • lever:chart-family
  • quality:insight

advice

Choose the connected trend form

Choose a line graph when the chart’s job is to show the overall pattern quickly. For example, use a simple line graph instead of a bar graph when viewers need the gist or need to pick out the trend at a glance.

reason

Why connected marks fit trend reading

A connected trajectory frames the data as one changing pattern rather than as a set of separate vertical values.

Mechanism: Connecting adjacent points helps viewers read the display as a trend, which matches situations where the main goal is quick gist and extrapolation.

Evidence: Across the paper’s preference studies, participants chose line graphs more often for gist and trend scenarios, while bar graphs showed the opposite pattern for detail scenarios (https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238400">Levy et al., 1996).

context

Use when the chart must communicate the overall pattern

  • User Goal: Show the gist of the data.
  • Task: Let viewers see the general trend quickly or extrapolate from it.
  • Data: A sequence of quantitative points shown in order.
  • Chart Setting: You are choosing between a line graph and a bar graph for a static display.
  • Audience: Viewers who need the pattern quickly.
  • Success Criterion: Viewers can state the overall trend after a brief glance.

exceptions

Do not use when point-by-point specifics are the priority

Break it when: The chart must show detailed relationships among individual data points. Why: In that situation, bar graphs were preferred over line graphs.

costs

Costs of emphasizing trend over detail

Sacrifice: Some emphasis on each individual value. Risk: A line graph can underplay the need to inspect specific point-to-point relationships. Mitigation: Switch to a bar graph if detailed inspection becomes the main task.

mistakes

Common misuse of the line choice

Mistake: Keeping a line graph when viewers are expected to answer detailed questions about individual points. Why it fails: The connected form supports gist better than point-by-point inspection.

check

Check the trend-vs-detail fit

Failure Sign: Reviewers focus on individual values instead of describing the overall pattern. Quick Check: Compare line and bar versions of the same data and ask which one better conveys the gist after a glance. Stronger Test: Show both versions briefly and ask viewers to describe the trend without discussing individual points first.

fix

Fix the chart family choice

  • Replace separate vertical bars with one connected line through the same points.
  • Redraw the graphic as a simple line graph if the current bar form is being used to show gist.
  • Recheck the revised chart by asking viewers to summarize the trend at a glance.

References

Levy, E., Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. (1996). Gratuitous graphics? Putting preferences in perspective. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Common Ground - CHI ’96, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238400