Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use pie charts only for relative part-whole reading

For part-whole reading, use relative-value interpretation on pie charts to improve fidelity and mitigate mistaken absolute-value lookup for novice readers.

  • purpose:refine
  • basis:empirical
  • chart:pie-donut
  • operator:part-whole
  • lever:encoding
  • quality:fidelity
  • literacy:novice

advice

Read slices as shares

Use pie chart slices for proportions and share comparisons, not for absolute values. For example, use a pie chart to identify the smallest share or compare whether one share is larger than another, but do not use a slice to read a raw count.

reason

Why relative reading fits the chart

A pie chart shows how each part relates to the whole. It does not directly show absolute values as independently readable magnitudes.

Mechanism: Slice size supports reading proportion, rank, and part-whole comparison. Absolute-value lookup over-asks what the slice encoding visually represents.

Evidence: In the VLAT blueprint, pie charts were marked as supporting only relative-value tasks, and the retained pie-chart items asked for relative share retrieval, smallest share, and relative comparison rather than absolute-value reading (Lee et al., 2017).

context

Use when the message is about shares

  • User Goal: Compare parts of a whole.
  • Task: Relative-value retrieval, extremum finding, or share comparison.
  • Chart Setting: A pie chart with categorical parts.
  • Audience: Novice or non-expert readers.
  • Success Criterion: Readers answer in terms of proportion, ratio, or which share is larger or smaller.

exceptions

Do not use when the message requires raw counts

Break it when: The reader needs exact absolute values from each category. Why: The slices encode only relative value in the whole.

costs

Tradeoffs of keeping the chart in relative terms

Sacrifice: You give up direct absolute-value lookup from the chart.
Risk: Readers may still treat a slice as if it supports a precise raw number.
Mitigation: Keep surrounding prompts and interpretations in share, ratio, or percentage terms.

mistakes

Common failure mode

Mistake: Asking a pie chart to answer a raw-value question. Why it fails: The chart encodes share of the whole, not a directly readable absolute amount.

check

How to test the chart

Failure Sign: The surrounding question or annotation asks for a raw count from a slice.
Quick Check: Scan the chart text for count-oriented wording instead of share-oriented wording.
Stronger Test: If the intended answer must be a precise absolute value rather than a proportion or ordering of shares, the pie chart is being used for the wrong readout.

fix

What to change

  • Rewrite the task or annotation in proportion, ratio, or share terms.
  • Remove exact absolute-value claims from slice-based readouts.
  • Replace the pie chart when exact value lookup is the main requirement.

References

Lee, S., Kim, S.-H., & Kwon, B. C. (2017). VLAT: Development of a Visualization Literacy Assessment Test. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598920