Guidelines
Suggest edit

Place choropleth maps side by side when comparing multiple parties

For comparing multiple groups across the same districts, use a small-multiple layout instead of a single choropleth map to improve insight and mitigate one-map overload for readers scanning regional patterns.

  • purpose:select
  • basis:heuristic
  • task:compare
  • structure:small-multiples:use
  • structure:single-view:avoid
  • chart:choropleth
  • data:geospatial
  • quality:insight:use
  • lever:layout-structure

advice

Split the map into side-by-side panels

Place multiple choropleth maps side by side when you need to show vote shares for more than one party. For example, use a few aligned district maps for several parties instead of forcing one choropleth map to carry all parties’ vote shares at once.

reason

Why side-by-side panels work

Separate panels let each district keep one value per map, while the shared geography across panels makes cross-party patterns visible.

Mechanism: One district can only encode one party’s vote share in one choropleth at a time, so splitting the view prevents that encoding conflict.

Evidence: The post states that each district in a choropleth map can only show the vote share of one party at a time and recommends placing a few maps next to each other to show multiple parties and reveal patterns (Muth, 2021).

context

Use when one map is not enough

  • User Goal: Compare regional patterns for several parties.
  • Task: Scan the same districts across multiple vote-share views.
  • Data: Multiple district-level vote-share series for the same geography.
  • Chart Setting: The maps can be placed next to each other.
  • Success Criterion: Readers can compare patterns across parties without losing the district geography.

exceptions

Do not use when only one party is being shown

Break it when: The map needs to show the vote share of only one party. Why: The post says a single choropleth can show one party’s vote share at a time.

costs

Tradeoffs of side-by-side panels

Sacrifice: The layout uses several maps instead of one. Risk: The comparison weakens if the maps are not placed next to each other. Mitigation: Keep the maps adjacent so readers can scan across them.

mistakes

Common failure around side-by-side panels

Mistake: Try to show several parties’ vote shares in one choropleth map. Why it fails: Each district can only show one party’s value at a time.

check

Check whether one map is overloaded

Failure Sign: One choropleth is expected to represent more than one party’s district vote share. Quick Check: Count how many party values each district must show; if it is more than one, compare the single-map attempt with a side-by-side layout. Stronger Test: Verify that each panel reuses the same district geography so the regional patterns can be compared across panels.

fix

Fix the overloaded choropleth

  • Split the single map into separate choropleth panels.
  • Place the panels next to each other.
  • Keep the same district geography across all panels.

References

Muth, L. C. (2021). How to visualize polls and results of the German election with Datawrapper. https://www.datawrapper.de/blog/data-visualizations-german-election-2021-with-datawrapper