Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use superimposed value-and-uncertainty maps for integrated lookup

For exact lookup tasks that require combining value and uncertainty, use superimposed encoding on bivariate maps to improve identification accuracy and mitigate error-prone cross-chart matching for readers interpreting uncertainty together with value.

  • purpose:select
  • basis:empirical
  • task:retrieve
  • structure:single-view:use
  • structure:multi-view:avoid
  • quality:fidelity:use
  • lever:layout-structure
  • operator:uncertainty

advice

Superimpose value and uncertainty

Use a single superimposed map when readers must combine value and uncertainty in one judgment. For example, encode both variables in the same heatmap cell instead of asking readers to match a value heatmap to a separate uncertainty heatmap.

reason

Why superposition works for integrated reading

Superimposed maps remove a second search step. Readers can decode one location once, instead of finding the same region in two separate displays and mentally joining the results.

Mechanism: Superposition reduces cross-chart correspondence work when a task depends on both the value and the uncertainty of the same mark.

Evidence: In the paper’s identification experiment, superimposed charts were significantly more accurate than juxtaposed charts for locating a target value-uncertainty pair in a heatmap-based task (Correll et al., 2018).

context

Use when value and uncertainty must be read together

  • User Goal: Find or verify locations that satisfy both a value condition and an uncertainty condition.
  • Task: Integrated lookup from a bivariate legend.
  • Data: Quantitative values paired with uncertainty for the same spatial cells or regions.
  • Chart Setting: Dense map-like or heatmap-like displays where the same position appears in every view.
  • Audience: Readers who need to make one decision from both variables at once.
  • Success Criterion: Higher identification accuracy with less cross-view confusion.

exceptions

Do not use when separate pattern reading is the goal

Break it when: The goal is to inspect value patterns and uncertainty patterns separately rather than fuse them into one immediate judgment. Why: Separate views let readers consider each variable on its own, which the paper notes can be useful for orthogonal analysis even though it hurts integrated lookup.

costs

What you give up with superposition

Sacrifice: You lose the simplicity of two independent univariate scales. Risk: Integrated color channels can be harder to decode than two separate single-variable displays. Mitigation: Keep the superimposed display for fusion tasks, and add coordinated highlighting if a separate view must remain.

mistakes

Common failure in integrated uncertainty displays

Mistake: Put value and uncertainty in adjacent maps and expect readers to combine them quickly during lookup. Why it fails: Readers must perform two searches and then match the results across views, which adds error.

check

Compare the two structures directly

Failure Sign: Readers look back and forth between views or misidentify cells that satisfy only one of the two conditions. Quick Check: Build one superimposed version and one side-by-side version of the same task, then ask a reviewer to find a specific value-uncertainty pair. Stronger Test: Time and score a short A/B lookup task; keep the structure that yields fewer mismatches on integrated questions.

fix

Edit the layout to remove cross-view matching

  • Merge value and uncertainty into one co-located bivariate encoding for each mark.
  • Replace separate value and uncertainty heatmaps with one heatmap that encodes both variables in each cell.
  • If you must keep separate views, add interaction that highlights corresponding regions across charts.

References

Correll, M., Moritz, D., & Heer, J. (2018). Value-Suppressing Uncertainty Palettes. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174216