Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use a symbol map for absolute regional totals

For comparison of non-temporal regional totals, prefer a symbol map over a choropleth on geospatial data to improve fidelity and mitigate misleading area-based comparison for readers interpreting raw counts.

  • purpose:select
  • basis:heuristic
  • task:compare
  • chart:map:use
  • chart:choropleth:avoid
  • data:geospatial
  • quality:fidelity
  • lever:chart-family

advice

Chart family for absolute totals

Replace the choropleth with a symbol map when the mapped number is an absolute count rather than a rate or other relative value. For example, map total people, total cases, or total events with symbols instead of filling each region by its raw count.

reason

Why raw counts need a different map

Filled regions make raw totals look comparable even when the values are not normalized across places.

Mechanism: A choropleth invites readers to compare filled areas as if the numbers were directly comparable by region. A symbol map avoids using geographic area as the main cue for absolute counts.

Evidence: The post says choropleth maps work best for relative data, explains that raw totals are not comparable without a denominator, and recommends a symbol map for absolute data (Muth, 2018).

context

Use when counts are not normalized

  • User Goal: Compare where total amounts are larger or smaller.
  • Task: Compare raw regional counts.
  • Data: Absolute totals by region, not rates or per-capita values.
  • Chart Setting: A map is already desired for regional display.
  • Audience: Readers interpreting regional quantities.
  • Success Criterion: Regions are not made to look comparable when the values need normalization.

exceptions

Do not use when the value is already relative

Break it when: The mapped value is a rate, share, or other relative measure. Why: The post says choropleth maps work best for relative data because those values are more comparable across regions.

costs

Costs of switching away from filled regions

Sacrifice: You give up the simple filled-area overview of the whole surface. Risk: A symbol map can end up mainly answering where most people live. Mitigation: Check whether the story is only population concentration before committing to an absolute-value map.

mistakes

Common raw-count failure

Mistake: Fill regions by raw totals in a choropleth. Why it fails: Readers compare the colors without the denominator that would make the values comparable.

check

Decide between choropleth and symbol map

Failure Sign: The choropleth draft asks readers to compare raw counts across regions directly. Quick Check: Put the choropleth draft next to a symbol-map draft of the same totals and ask which one avoids treating the raw counts like normalized values. Stronger Test: Ask whether a reader can fairly compare two regions without any population or denominator context; if not, avoid the choropleth.

fix

Edit the map for absolute totals

  • Replace region fills with symbols sized by the total.
  • Rewrite the unit label so it clearly states that the values are totals.
  • If the real question is about rates, compute a relative measure and return to a choropleth.
  • Reconsider the map if it only shows where population is concentrated.

References

Muth, L. C. (2018). What to consider when creating choropleth maps. https://www.datawrapper.de/blog/choroplethmaps