Use a topology-preserving cartogram for adjacency lookup
For lookup tasks on geospatial cartograms, prefer a topology-preserving cartogram type on distorted map views to improve fidelity and mitigate neighbor-identification errors for readers checking which regions touch.
- purpose:refine
- basis:empirical
- task:relate
- chart:map
- data:geospatial
- quality:fidelity:use
- lever:chart-family
- reading-mode:lookup
advice
Preserve shared borders for neighbor finding
Choose a topology-preserving cartogram when readers must identify neighboring regions. For example, use a contiguous or rectangular cartogram instead of a non-contiguous or Dorling cartogram for find-the-neighbor tasks.
reason
Why topology preservation matters for adjacency
Neighbor lookup depends on shared borders, and readers make many more mistakes when those borders are broken or only approximated.
Mechanism: A topology-preserving cartogram keeps adjacency explicit, so readers can answer neighbor questions from the cartogram itself instead of inferring them from approximate proximity.
Evidence: In the controlled study, contiguous and rectangular cartograms substantially outperformed non-contiguous and Dorling cartograms on the find adjacency task, with significant error advantages for topology-preserving designs over the non-topology-preserving ones (Nusrat et al., 2018; Zeng & Battle, 2023).
context
Use when touching relationships are part of the question
- User Goal: Determine which regions share a border.
- Task: Find adjacency in a cartogram.
- Data: Geospatial regions where topological relations matter.
- Chart Setting: A static cartogram is being used for neighbor lookup rather than only for broad overview.
- Success Criterion: Lower adjacency error.
exceptions
Do not use when borders are not the main reading need
- Break it when: The main task is recognizing a region by its original shape. Why: Non-contiguous cartograms preserve shape better for that task.
- Break it when: The main task is only broad pattern summary. Why: Dorling cartograms were better for summarize tasks and do not need exact adjacency.
costs
Tradeoffs of preserving topology
Sacrifice: Some shape or position fidelity, depending on the cartogram type. Risk: A rectangular cartogram can become too schematic for other map-reading tasks. Mitigation: If the chart also needs stronger geographic recognizability, use a contiguous cartogram rather than a rectangular one.
mistakes
Common failure mode for adjacency lookup
Mistake: Expecting a non-contiguous or Dorling cartogram to support neighbor finding because nearby regions still look close. Why it fails: Proximity is not a reliable substitute for preserved shared borders.
check
Check whether adjacency is readable
Failure Sign: Readers confuse touching regions with merely nearby regions. Quick Check: Ask one neighbor-finding question on the current cartogram and on a topology-preserving alternative. Stronger Test: Compare adjacency error on the same set of questions across the two cartogram types.
fix
Fix the adjacency failure
- Replace the current cartogram with a contiguous cartogram or a rectangular cartogram.
- Preserve shared borders between regions instead of relying on proximity alone.
- If the current rectangular cartogram is too schematic for the rest of the task, switch to a contiguous cartogram.