Guidelines
Suggest edit

Use a topology-preserving cartogram for adjacency lookup

For lookup tasks on geospatial cartograms, prefer a topology-preserving cartogram type on distorted map views to improve fidelity and mitigate neighbor-identification errors for readers checking which regions touch.

  • purpose:refine
  • basis:empirical
  • task:relate
  • chart:map
  • data:geospatial
  • quality:fidelity:use
  • lever:chart-family
  • reading-mode:lookup

advice

Preserve shared borders for neighbor finding

Choose a topology-preserving cartogram when readers must identify neighboring regions. For example, use a contiguous or rectangular cartogram instead of a non-contiguous or Dorling cartogram for find-the-neighbor tasks.

reason

Why topology preservation matters for adjacency

Neighbor lookup depends on shared borders, and readers make many more mistakes when those borders are broken or only approximated.

Mechanism: A topology-preserving cartogram keeps adjacency explicit, so readers can answer neighbor questions from the cartogram itself instead of inferring them from approximate proximity.

Evidence: In the controlled study, contiguous and rectangular cartograms substantially outperformed non-contiguous and Dorling cartograms on the find adjacency task, with significant error advantages for topology-preserving designs over the non-topology-preserving ones (Nusrat et al., 2018; Zeng & Battle, 2023).

context

Use when touching relationships are part of the question

  • User Goal: Determine which regions share a border.
  • Task: Find adjacency in a cartogram.
  • Data: Geospatial regions where topological relations matter.
  • Chart Setting: A static cartogram is being used for neighbor lookup rather than only for broad overview.
  • Success Criterion: Lower adjacency error.

exceptions

Do not use when borders are not the main reading need

  • Break it when: The main task is recognizing a region by its original shape. Why: Non-contiguous cartograms preserve shape better for that task.
  • Break it when: The main task is only broad pattern summary. Why: Dorling cartograms were better for summarize tasks and do not need exact adjacency.

costs

Tradeoffs of preserving topology

Sacrifice: Some shape or position fidelity, depending on the cartogram type. Risk: A rectangular cartogram can become too schematic for other map-reading tasks. Mitigation: If the chart also needs stronger geographic recognizability, use a contiguous cartogram rather than a rectangular one.

mistakes

Common failure mode for adjacency lookup

Mistake: Expecting a non-contiguous or Dorling cartogram to support neighbor finding because nearby regions still look close. Why it fails: Proximity is not a reliable substitute for preserved shared borders.

check

Check whether adjacency is readable

Failure Sign: Readers confuse touching regions with merely nearby regions. Quick Check: Ask one neighbor-finding question on the current cartogram and on a topology-preserving alternative. Stronger Test: Compare adjacency error on the same set of questions across the two cartogram types.

fix

Fix the adjacency failure

  • Replace the current cartogram with a contiguous cartogram or a rectangular cartogram.
  • Preserve shared borders between regions instead of relying on proximity alone.
  • If the current rectangular cartogram is too schematic for the rest of the task, switch to a contiguous cartogram.

References

Nusrat, S., Alam, Md. J., & Kobourov, S. (2018). Evaluating Cartogram Effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(2), 1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2642109
Zeng, Z., & Battle, L. (2023). A Review and Collation of Graphical Perception Knowledge for Visualization Recommendation. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581349